Chernobyl wildlife is thriving

Chernobyl nuclear power plant
A study has found that nuclear accidents might not result in significant long-term damage to local wildlife. Researchers from the Universities of Portsmouth and the West of England, found that wildlife populations in the exclusion zone around Chernobyl have recovered and even increased since the 1986 accident, and expect that the effects of last year's Fukushima incident are likely to be similar.

"I wasn't really surprised by these findings," said Professor Jim Smith, an environmental physicist at the University of Portsmouth's School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, who co-authored the study. "There have been many high profile findings on the radiation damage to wildlife at Chernobyl but it's very difficult to see significant damage and we are not convinced by some of the claims."

Some previous studies suggested that the Chernobyl nuclear accident would result in long-term damage to local bird populations. It was thought that the birds' antioxidant defence mechanisms would sustain serious damage from radiation. However, by modelling the production of free radicals from radiation, UK-based team found that the birds' antioxidant mechanisms were capable of dealing with radiation at density levels present in Chernobyl and Fukushima.

"We showed that changes in antioxidant levels in birds in Chernobyl could not be explained by direct radiation damage," said Professor Smith. "We would expect other wildlife to be similarly resistant to oxidative stress from radiation at these levels.

"Similarly, radiation levels at Fukushima would not be expected to cause oxidative stress to wildlife," he continued. "We believe that it is likely that apparent damage to bird populations at Chernobyl is caused by differences in habitat, diet or ecosystem structure rather than radiation."

Whilst it is widely known that extremely high radiation levels damaged organisms immediately after the Chernobyl accident, Professor Smith points out that current levels are hundreds of times lower.

"We can't rule out some effect on wildlife of the radiation, but wildlife populations in the exclusion zone around Chernobyl have recovered and are actually doing well and even better than before because the human population has been removed," he explained.

The findings of Professor Smith and his colleagues, published in the journal Biology Letters, could cast new light onto the debate surrounding the biological effects of radiation.



I wonder, whether the wildlife population of the Chernobyl exclusion area is slightly increased because of "the birds' antioxidant defence mechanisms " and "the human population has been removed", as mentioned by Professor Jim Smith, or mainly because the birds and other animals have permanently entered the exclusion zone from the healthy surrounding environment in Ukraine since the accident. In the latter case, question of the antioxidant controlling the free radical damage caused by the radiation is not critical for the wildlife's proliferation that is mainly controlled by the wildlife migrations.
Mladen Biru� - Zagreb, Croatia
The RSPCA's Dr Penny Hawkins believes that the mass media tends to sensationalise animal experimentation as a black-and-white battle between the balaclava and the lab coat. Do you agree?
Dr Mohammad Jeenah from South Africa's Agricultural Research Council contends that smallholders will play a vital role in establishing food security for future generations. Do you agree?
Yes 77% No 23%
A medicine cannot be licensed unless it has been tested on animals. Unless the law changes, millions of animals will suffer unnecessarily. The RSPCA is absolutely right in their comments and the new EU directive is long overdue.

Commented Anna on
Reconciling science and animal welfare Ltd, Ebenezer House, Ryecroft, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 2UB
Tel: +44 (0)1782 630200, Fax: +44 (0)1782 740066,
Registered in England and Wales  Co. Reg No. 4521155   Vat Reg No. 902 1814 62